Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Johan Taharin's avatar

Voters turnout in Selangor was only at 65%.

90% ph voters voted while only 40% pn voters did.

Why?

Most pn voters thought the other would vote, some cant afford to come back and there were many.

In the end, pn was short of 7 seats. The reality is 12 seats lost to ph in selangor that pn could hv easily won with a huge majority was lost because pn voters had low turn out.

Hence, if 90% of pn voters turn up in pn majority dun, the result would have been different.

Now, pn will hv to depend on zahid to resign and replace him with tok mat. Anwar cannot afford this so he has to get his attorney general to withdraw zahids criminal trial.

Zahid will be free of 47 criminal charges soon and he will continue to be dpm and presiden of umno.

Riza chalid attempt to use anwar to secure the REE mining deal via Sultan Kedah failed. Anwar has to use other states sultan but riza will make his money. Oil n gas deal likely.

Anwars economic minister has awarded himself a rgt4bil power plant deal via his partner lee choo boo and to be paid for by the governement via UEM group.

What reform?

Expand full comment
Chng kook seng's avatar

Low turnout actually benefit PN. The fact is Malay political unity is in shambles. No one single party can claim to be dominant. The only party that is rock solid is DAP. Its members don't do frog jumps. They are reliable through thick and thin. Their policies are rational and nationalistic. It must be the backbone of any government that intends to govern Malaysia.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts