MIER Is No More?

By Wan Sulaiman Wan Ismail

With the Malaysian Institute of Economic Research (MIER) no longer publishing critical reports like the Consumer Sentiments Index (CSI) and Business Conditions Index (BCI), along with its quarterly economic updates and outlooks, one has to ask: What is MIER’s raison d'être? The institute appears to be in a state of atrophy, its website revealing just one remaining research officer. 

 This situation suggests that MIER is no longer capable of conducting rigorous, in-house research. Instead, any new projects would likely be outsourced—an approach that undermines the very purpose of having a dedicated research institution. In a world where institutions live or die by their relevance and utility, the MIER stands at a crossroads. 

 Some argue that MIER has simply outlived its purpose, eclipsed by a growing array of other institutions and think tanks that have emerged across Malaysia. In an era where governments, private organizations, and international agencies are stepping up with cutting-edge research and fresh insights, MIER is seen by many as duplicative at best, redundant at worst. 

 If Malaysia is to focus its resources wisely, why not reallocate what’s currently spent on MIER toward entities that are truly making an impact?

 There’s also a broader question of policy relevance. For an organization like MIER to survive, its work needs to shape the nation’s economic planning and governance. But if its reports aren’t influencing policymakers, what’s the point? If MIER’s findings are gathering dust rather than driving decisions, then perhaps the funding could be redirected to research institutions that actually move the needle on policy.

 And then there’s the question of bias and independence. Once hailed as a trusted source of analysis, MIER risks being perceived as a relic of an older era, out of touch with modern economic realities and, worse, disconnected from the socioeconomic concerns of everyday Malaysians. If its work feels irrelevant or is marred by accusations of bias, the very legitimacy of the institution comes under fire.

 Financial mismanagement is another potent argument for defunding. Allegations of inefficiency, opaque governance, or misuse of funds can erode trust quickly. If money isn’t being spent effectively, why continue to invest in the status quo?

 Beyond that, the private sector and international expertise are knocking on the door. With global think tanks, consultants, and universities providing fresh perspectives and more competitive insights, why stick with an old horse when there are faster, more innovative ones to ride? The argument here is simple: Malaysia could lean into more globally attuned expertise.

 MIER’s lack of innovation may well be its Achilles heel. As digital economies rise, artificial intelligence reshapes industries, and sustainability becomes the new economic imperative, MIER risks falling behind. If it can’t innovate, especially in forward-looking fields like green economics or the digital economy, critics are likely to push for its dissolution, arguing that Malaysia’s future demands think tanks more focused on the challenges of tomorrow.

 Compelling arguments, significant concerns about the direction and governance of

MIER since 2019. A summary of some key arguments:

 Point 1: Deviation from Core Mission

 Involvement in Non-Core Projects: Since 2019, MIER has engaged in projects like the Hydrogen Bus and the 3rd National Car, which are outside its traditional focus on economic research. These activities may indicate a shift away from MIER's intended purpose, leading to questions about the appropriateness of its current project portfolio.

 Potential Conflicts of Interest: The Ministry of Finance (MOF) should investigate by requesting a list of projects undertaken by MIER between 2019 and 2023, including details of the contracts and those responsible. This transparency could reveal if certain individuals or entities have inappropriately benefited, suggesting possible conflicts of interest.

 Point 2: Governance and Board Composition Concerns

 Irregularities in the Board of Trustees: MOF is suggested to request MIER’s meeting minutes from 2019-2023 to identify any irregularities in the Board’s appointments and amendments (illegal) to MIER’s memorandum of association, which could point to governance issues.

 Lack of Academic and Distinguished Representation: The current Board’s composition, which allegedly lacks academics or distinguished individuals and is instead dominated by businesspeople with political connections, raises concerns about the integrity and direction of MIER. This situation could undermine MIER’s credibility and objectivity in its research and recommendations.

 Point 3: Potential Government Intervention

 Request for Board Resignation: It is proposed that the Ministry of Finance (MOF) has the authority to request the Board of Trustees at MIER to step down, especially since MIER is funded by the MOF and operates on government property. This reflects the government's leverage over MIER due to its financial and logistical support.

 Precedent from ISIS: The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) pressed the reset button for the Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS), leading to the entire Board of Trustees being replaced. This sets a precedent for similar action at MIER, reinforcing the argument that the government could, and perhaps should, intervene to reform or reset MIER's governance.

 These points strengthen the case for a significant overhaul or even the potential closure of MIER, particularly if the institute's current operations and governance are found to be misaligned with its intended purpose or compromised by conflicts of interest.

 Implications for Defunding or Shutting Down MIER

 If these concerns are substantiated, they could justify arguments for defunding or shutting down MIER. The perceived deviation from its mission, potential conflicts of interest, and governance issues could be strong grounds for questioning the institute’s continued relevance and effectiveness.

 Given these realities, it raises a fundamental question: Why does MIER still exist in its current form?

 *Wan Sulaiman Wan Ismail is a Scholar Of Southeast Asian Studies.*

Subscribe Below: