Political parties must stop being dictatorships
Political reform must come first from within the parties
One thing common to all major political parties is that they are political dictatorships.
Opaque and unaccountable central committees make all major political and administrative decisions. This is not much different than the politburos in far away communist countries.
There appears to be two classes of party membership. Those rank-and-file members who have no say in party matters, and those elected or appointed to positions, where they have influence upon party decision making. Rank and file members have little or no recourse in objecting to decisions they don’t like.
For example, we see the two top UMNO positions were exempted from facing any party elections, with Bersatu now attempting to follow UMNO’s lead. This is abhorrent to the concept of democracy. In the case of UMNO, the suspension of party elections for the top two posts came at a time there was legitimate alternative candidates for the position. Democracy was abandoned in the interests of keeping one clique in power over another.
In addition, party members were expelled and suspended without due process within UMNO. Those expelled and suspended had little party recourse to complain about the absence of natural justice in the decisions made by the Supreme Council.
These practices are not just confined to UMNO. The PKR president can make appointments to key committees, bypassing any internal electoral processes. This ignores, and even goes against the wishes of rank-and-file members.
We observe political parties abandoning their party platforms when they become the government. Party platforms are shared visons about what party members believe is best for the nation. Time and time again this is ignored, when a party wins government.
Malaysian political parties have democratic deficits. How can the Malaysian democratic system be reformed, if the political parties themselves don’t practice the principles of democracy?
This is a major cause of political instability. Politicians gain control of political parties and use them as vehicles to gain and perpetuate their own personal power.
This has been to the determent of Malaysian federalism. National party leaders select state chief ministers and control the politics of individual states. Malaysia as a consequence is a flawed federation, as state governments don’t have the ability to protect state rights from the central government, if they are of the same party, and the state leader is selected by the prime minister.
This also flows down to state candidates in both state and federal seats. We have seen how DAP secretary-general Anthony Loke has been placing his ‘all stars’ in seats which has alienated much of the traditional DAP support base. UMNO president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi’s use of power over candidate selection hurt UMNO very badly in GE15.
Former prime minister Mahathir Mohamed’s surprise sacking of Anwar Ibrahim from all UMNO party positions and deputy prime minister, was the beginning of the end for UMNO. In 1995, UMNO won 88 seats in the federal parliament. Last general election, UMNO won only 26 seats.
Party political and administrative power in the hands of individuals, rather than committees set out in party constitutions has been a source of political instability.
Candidates for public office should be selected by local party members. The state and federal branches of the party should be allowed to send a percentage of delegates to vote in local public office selection processes. This measure may attract more politicians who are interested in advancing the country, rather than themselves. This will help keep the ‘warlord system’ in check, as it will be more difficult to obtain party candidate pre-selection.
State parliamentary leaders should be chosen by the party members within state assemblies free of federal party influence. After all, who runs a particular state should be a local party affair.
Party policy platforms should be compulsory for parliamentary leaders to adopt and implement. The failure to do so, should make the leaders accountable at state conferences.
This is the only way full democracy can be improved in Malaysia. The political parties must have their own respective reformasi first. There is no point discussing the first-past-the-post voting system, if political parties aren’t democratized first.
Originally published in My Sin Chew 19th May 2023
Subscribe Below:
Pkr is a small party. In reality it only has about 120,000 members. In gombak itself, they only have 12,000 registered members.
Pkr won in gombak in ge 15 even though they have such a small number of members.
It shows that the campaign is more important than the party size.
Pkr have regular political bureau meetings. it sounded grand where the top party council members have a chance to discuss and the president will decide whatever issues there is.
In reality, the president couldnt careless what is decided upon and go about doing whatever he likes.
Look at the way pmx presides over the country.
You think he listen to what dap or zahid or gps and grs say?
You think he cares what the King says?
You really think he want to solve the peoples hardship?
You think he cares what the local,state or federal government need?
You think he even cares what he says?
Political reform? 🤣🤣🤣
I am lost.
I lost the connections