3 Comments

What a load of horse pooh! Where in world does the Malaysian Federal the constitution prescribe or provide for secular appointments in the cvil service? Secondly and more importanly where does the constitution define "secularism?" Where does Murray Hunter and his many aliases define secularism. Appointments to the civil service is the prerogative of the government of the day. And if by their defintion means Muslim and Malay then so be it.

In Lee Kuan Yew's Singapore secularism and a meritocracy mean jaundiced skin, slanty eyes, Chinglish and arrogant being secular.

In Malaya under the British it was the Jaffna Panakoteh Indian and the Keralites with a sprinkling of token Malay Muslims and an infestation of Chinese in the government contracts departments that meant secularism.

Stay accross the line in Hadyai where disease ridden women of the night proliferate to service parasitic Ex pats like you. An appropriate jurisdiction for the likes of you.

Expand full comment

"Murray Hunter and his many aliases"

What are those "aliases" then?

I hope there isn't a "Kutty" one...

Expand full comment

Chicken Korma, it is not whoever you claim Singapore's meritocracy has plenty of Indians in gomen and their civil service.

An outstanding and interesting one (when compared to the retard monkeys in Bolehland's gomen and bureaucracy) is that now-retired outspoken Mahbubani. Well, unlike our useless monkeys, he's got an international audience.

I'm sure you'll have a mouthful from your snout against him, so do please be jealous, jerk off and froth at the mouth about him. The first great thing about Mahbubani is he is not Malay. The second great thing is he's not Muslim, Alhamdullilah!

And please leave out Singapore's constitution and shagging yourself stupid over it, you are hardly versed in the Bolehland one as it is wtf...

Expand full comment