This reads like a half-baked waffle, a masturbation over some supposed legal-sounding text as interpreted by some unemployed and unemployable jungle garden varieties of plantation niggah lawyers we are blessed, or rather stuck with that occasionally appear as some enlightened guru, sage, schizo, or plain lunatic.
Just why our better qualified lawyers, ie those with the better qualifications, and in gainful employment and not having to impersonate court clerks do not want to engage in mutual shagging over a bunch of texts with those great unwashed at the fringe of law has always been a big puzzle.
Is there anything half-useful that anyone tossing about with those texts can use to mount any challenge in the court of world opinion? If yes, go ahead. If not, there's plenty of truth in what Old Lao Tzu says about great stupidity always sound like great wisdom.
And if not, you washed-out tossers are just not going to get anywhere. No qualified lawyers or men of substance are ever going to come near you - even on the internet. Best stop shagging yerself stupid, stop harbouring any delusion you are or can be a lawyer (or even a court clerk). Keep taking them pills and wait for the day some Malaysians may unleash you into some international hearing.
Me? I won't waste my time listening to any legal genius for free. There's just no such thing. Now, just toss a few ikan bilis in that direction and tell the genius to fcuk off.
Law is man-made. Open to multiple interpretations, disputes, compliances and amendments so long as devious human greed exists in a world with limited resources. If there is no resolve in the hearts of the people to be good and treat their fellow man better then no amount of law-making, however clearly written, will elevate us beyond an arm's length of being more than just the animals that we are.
This reads like a half-baked waffle, a masturbation over some supposed legal-sounding text as interpreted by some unemployed and unemployable jungle garden varieties of plantation niggah lawyers we are blessed, or rather stuck with that occasionally appear as some enlightened guru, sage, schizo, or plain lunatic.
Just why our better qualified lawyers, ie those with the better qualifications, and in gainful employment and not having to impersonate court clerks do not want to engage in mutual shagging over a bunch of texts with those great unwashed at the fringe of law has always been a big puzzle.
Is there anything half-useful that anyone tossing about with those texts can use to mount any challenge in the court of world opinion? If yes, go ahead. If not, there's plenty of truth in what Old Lao Tzu says about great stupidity always sound like great wisdom.
And if not, you washed-out tossers are just not going to get anywhere. No qualified lawyers or men of substance are ever going to come near you - even on the internet. Best stop shagging yerself stupid, stop harbouring any delusion you are or can be a lawyer (or even a court clerk). Keep taking them pills and wait for the day some Malaysians may unleash you into some international hearing.
Me? I won't waste my time listening to any legal genius for free. There's just no such thing. Now, just toss a few ikan bilis in that direction and tell the genius to fcuk off.
This article must read and re read.
Law is man-made. Open to multiple interpretations, disputes, compliances and amendments so long as devious human greed exists in a world with limited resources. If there is no resolve in the hearts of the people to be good and treat their fellow man better then no amount of law-making, however clearly written, will elevate us beyond an arm's length of being more than just the animals that we are.