5 Comments

The article is a lazy effort basing it's enlightened views on certain Western sources with axes to grind with China.

The article looks every bit like stuff a schoolgirl would copy off somewhere else word for word without any input of critical analysis. I can even swear some pimp has supplied the article to be signed and published!

"Political Economic & International Relations analyst" my sweet camel urine!

Expand full comment

SAO is absolutely right on the subject. For example, the ISEAS was established by Lee Kuan Yew in 1972. Only young UMNO aspirants were invited to its forums. The following day a glowing report in the Straits Times was published to the delight of the target subject. Vide ST Library. Currently, a Kuala Lumpur think tank which staff were alleged to be favoured by Singapore made a big play for Malaysia to accept the CPTPP/TPPA - the Malaysia Killer. And no one has mentioned that the once boring and uninteresting ye olde KL has since taken over the espionage hotspots of Bangkok and Singapore during the Cold War 1948-1989 for many years with reports of North Korean assassinations, Pakistani abductions, roaming Tamil Tigers, Sinkiang dissidents, a TV personality being the bedmate of an Israeli for 10 years etc ,etc.. Soon OO7 will visit KL too ! We need the US dollars ! Malaysia's very own 004 left us not too long ago.

Expand full comment

Ah, it's the purveyor of schizophrenic warped kopitiam type bull manure again..! Mr Corn Can, if it's "Sinkiang" meaning Xinjiang in its more smooth non-Hakka pronunciation, and in the way it's been written the last some thirty years ago, it must be your pretend-Angmoh grasp of the world still dearly embraced by your clan of British stooge banana running dogs.

Lee Kuan Yew is a famous pretend-Angmoh previously aligned with his Brit massahs, thought himself as a "middle class English" while the English of any class just thought of him as just another running dog, couldn't speak or speak any Chinese (or Hakka) till the latter years of his dog life when he realised his servitude to "Empire" brought him little.

That was made worse when China, a country he despised more than his own money-laundering patch, was growing mightier than Mother England, and he would soon start to lick Chinese boots, something his idiotic banana son continues as his meaning of life.

Neither "Harry" nor his idiotic son could manage speaking Chinese without their weird fake "English" accent, many loved the two speaking "Chinese" and would listen to them just to have a riot over the accent which is the already weird broken Hakka, and a quaint oriental Hollywood Singapolish. Mind you, this is the speak of the pretend-Angmoh types of which your clapped out clan is.

Sunshine, you may have a schizophrenic loss of sense of time, and stuck in a fixed time period of your bizarre life, but being in your unfortunate state doesn't help any discourse or make you any genius.

Please stick with the times not with the one fixed period you are condemned to be stuck with, and, better still, not take anyone trudging through your blazing bull manure, please.

Go through the bull manure you are spewing to pretend you are in the know about things hush-hush cloak and dagger in the spook world, you only show apart from being grovelling stooge running dogs, you and your whore clan are a bunch of nobody sellout of Malaysia.

Now get out of that Hakka kopitiam before the punters there tiaow your obese lump of lard stoopid! If you are up to it, qualify yourself about the Korea, Taiwan, blah, and even that mystical "Sinkiang", from your antique knowledge shoved up your rear end by your very much alive to you colonial massahs Ptuuiii..!

Expand full comment

A timely comment. Time to rethink and reset our orientation before it's too late. China is only keen to spread its tentacles via commerce. It has no respect for international law and sovereignty of other countries.

Expand full comment

"It has no respect for international law and sovereignty of other countries."

Just like the good ole U S of A, but do substantiate your remark, please.

Expand full comment